Home/BlogThis is just a short update regarding how global surface air temperature (Tsfc) trends are tracking 34 CMIP6 climate models through 2025. The following plot shows the Tsfc trends, 1979-2025, ranked from the warmest to the coolest.
“Observations” is an average of 4 datasets: HadCRUT5, NOAAGlobalTemp Version 6 (now featuring AI, of course), ERA5 (a reanalysis dataset), and the Berkeley 1×1 deg. dataset, which produces a trend identical to HadCRUT5 (+0.205 C/decade).
I consider reanalyses to be in the class of “observations” since they are constrained to match, in some average sense, the measurements made from the surface, weather balloons, global commercial aircraft, satellites, and the kitchen sink.
The observations moved up one place in the rankings since the last time I made one of these plots, mainly due to an anomalously warm 2024.
In your view, do CMIP6 models represent a significant improvement over CMIP5 when compared with observations?
No model that uses GHG radiative forcing is a significant improvement.
Indeed!
How did you select these 34 CMIP6 climate models? Are they using the same GHG concentrations history that we had?
Another comparison:
https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/climate-model-projections-compared-to-observations/
Are you saying that Roy is wrong?